Lawrence Martin in the Globe this morning has it exactly on point:
... if he’s to be credible, Mr. Ignatieff needs more than rhetoric. He needs a comprehensive Bring Back Democracy plan. He needs it, and so do we. Someone’s got to get serious about this country’s drift from what was once a respectable democracy into today’s sham version. Ever since Pierre Trudeau started overcentralizing the power structure four decades ago, we’ve been regressing into what former Quebec Superior Court justice John Gomery, who headed up the federal sponsorship inquiry, described as “one-man government.”
Why don't Canadians do one-man government well? Frankly, it is because we create leaders who are either dull like Martin or dreamers like Trudeau or both like Harper. Chretien was the only one to do anything effectively with all that power when he beat back the deficit. The trouble is, of course, that Iggy is of the same sort. He's a good fellow how has plenty more in the coconut than I do but is also dreadfully dull as a public personality. It's not his fault - it's Canada's. Remember, this is the nation that spawned the great populist revivalist by name of Preston Manning.
What to do? Maybe ask the Belgians or the Finns how to make our leaders more lively.

Comments
Jay Currie - September 2, 2010 6:56 PM
I'm not sure I want more lively leaders. Our friends in America managed to elect a very lively chap indeed and you can see how well that is going for them.
On the other hand, decentralizing power, giving MPs more power and responsibility, and, perhaps, trying to create ceters of power outside the PMO is a very good idea.
Too bad no Prime Minister or wannabe PM will ever try it.
Ben (The Tiger) - September 3, 2010 11:02 AM
Real reforms which let MPs hold individual power bases would be the only way to do it.
When a Bill Casey could stay as a Tory or a John Nunziata could stay as a Liberal, in spite of their budget votes -- that's when this presidential-style parliamentary model could be laid to rest.
So either primaries/fixed unbreakable rules for constituency meetings or a return to pre-1974 ballot rules are needed.
Anything short of that is just rhetoric.