Gen X at 40

Canada's Favorite Blog

Comments

Caren -

Congrats regarding what you wrote on [redacted] blog!

Ben (The Tiger) -

A decision not to decide?

Stephen Lyon Mackenzie Harper?

Renee -

This government, frankly, bugs me. This whole $120B infrastructure deficit has been ignored for so long ... now, Harper said the word "recession" and yet still they sit, being ... unstimulating.

Also, they did away with the EI surplus despite warnings of an economic downturn. Grr.

Argent -

Government has positioned for this skillful move by the Prime Minister. His wisdom, no doubt, directed parliamentary economic inquires with the best minds in Government. Well compensated experts contracted to determine bold new vision for Canada have reported their key findings.

It's to the future you must look for the sake of the children! It's important for you to gather your strength and prepare for the flurry of activity which will no doubt follow in a few winter's time. Following the wisdom of your august Leader and the sound advice from the intellectual elite you must enter the state of transience and make it all go away! Besides, he needs his beauty sleep.

Jay Currie -

There are good arguments for getting funds flowing into already budgeted infrastructure projects. There may be good arguments for initiating further such projects. But there may also be excellent arguments for avoiding inflation and trying to keep any deficit within reasonable bounds.

Right now there is a panic in the United States which will almost certainly result in a wave of money inflation which may simply exacerbate and already difficult situation. Canada is in a very different position than our American friends or our European friends. We have been well served by the stodginess of our bankers and the stinginess of our governments. We have the capacity to actually target government expenditure to where it will do the most good. Taking a few months to plan the intervention may very well leave us substantially better off.

Alan -

I note your use of the subjunctive case. Care to answer the implicit "why" that accompanies that structure?

Renee -

Hey, Jay, actually, I think it's not a good reason, I think it's a stupid, ideological one.

PS: The Progressive Economics Forum is a group of respected economists. Even TD plagarized them once. So I'm inclined to believe 'em.

Post a Comment: Make Sure You Chew Your Food Thirty Times, Too

Email addresses are not displayed with your comment and will not be shared.
Allowed tags are: <em>, <strong>, <code> and <a href="url">. All other tags will be displayed as plain text.