Gen X at 40

Canada's Favorite Blog

Comments

David Janes -

Note the difference/confusion between "nanoparticles" and "nanotechnology" and "nanomachines". Nanomachines have moving parts and can do stuff. Nanoparticles are just materials engineered / designed to have certain properties that emerge from nanoscale structure. I.e. kind of a "active" vs. "passive". Nanotech can mean either, depending on the circumstance or speaker.

The issue with the (passive) nanoparticles is that they may potentially pass through cell membranes (etc.) gumming up the works. We don't know because it's more or less new stuff. The issue with (active) nanomachines is the Grey Goo Scenario, aka being eaten by tiny machines for parts & energy.

ry -

No, no, no, Al. You've already cornered Beer. You aren't allowed cheetos/cheezypoofs. Besides, the cheetos are mine.

Honestly, this shows something I've said elsewhere in relation to drugs: people push to hard to have stuff quickly without knowing a goodly amount of what the risks are. I was livid when the FDA shortened the time to greenlight a drug by allowing simultaneous phase testing. To do it right, to 'do no harm', it takes time; but people want their cure for gramps yesterday.

Alan -

The residual dust of packaged snacks needs it own word, so special it is.

Post a Comment: Out! Out! Damn Tiny Substances!!!

Email addresses are not displayed with your comment and will not be shared.
Allowed tags are: <em>, <strong>, <code> and <a href="url">. All other tags will be displayed as plain text.