The first snow settled in to Easlakia just when a rotten creaky achy cold arrived as well. Days and days of not June. But, still, the holiday feeling is starting already. Just four work weeks to go, after all. But everything is not as jolly as it should be.
- The spirit of the season appears to be alive and well in Detroit where they are handing money away to Canadians - though you don't really have to travel to get the benefit. Some complain. Did we complain at others shopping here when there was a 62 cent dollar?
- If you ever wondered if there really was a Grinch with a heart too sizes too small, consider the policy of the goverment of PEI that you pay them tax on things residents buy anywhere in the world. When I first moved there ten years ago they ran TV ads about "smuggling" that gave no clue about what they were really talking about. Santa knows.
- Our rural overlords have missed out on the holiday spirit so far. In fact they have been acting more like the naughty pre-schooler than leaders of the nation. On Ontario's Premier pointing out that the new scheme for Parliament leaves Ontario uniquely under-represented:
His criticisms have sparked a new round of bickering with Ottawa, which took a nasty turn yesterday with federal Conservative House Leader Peter Van Loan accusing the Premier of not living up to the province's traditional role as nation builder. "He seems to prefer to become the small man of Confederation, focusing only on taking partisan shots while not concerned about the strength of Canada as a whole," Mr. Van Loan told The Canadian Press.
The small man? For looking out for one's own interests? Hardly the sort of language used when Alberta looks out for its interests. Then an actual small man, Finance Minister Flaherty says this:Municipal leaders upset at the lack of federal funding for towns and cities should stop "whining" and "do their job," federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty says. Faced with a new study that shows urban infrastructure is "near collapse," Flaherty sidestepped responsibility yesterday, noting "we're not in the pothole business in the government of Canada."
Then one more insult, perhaps the worst of all:Defence Minister Peter MacKay called his Liberal critics "un-Canadian" yesterday for accusing the government of allowing the transfer of juveniles taken prisoner in Afghanistan into the hands of "torturers." Mr. MacKay insisted that Liberal defence critic Denis Coderre was making "scurrilous allegations" against soldiers, while Mr. Coderre bristled that the Defence Minister had attacked his patriotism for raising questions about the government's conduct.
By interjecting the soldiers into a policy debate where MacKay is the decision maker, he is the one doing the sullying. And he fails to note the general rule that trotting out "unCanadian" in any discussion deserves only one response: "you're a dolt". These sorts of accusations are, as far as I can tell, indicative of a bunch who do not know what leadership is. It's kinda sad that the Reform legacy has been lowered to become this. - If this goes through, it's also time for a small small claims court, then.
- And has someone forgot the spirit of the holidays in Halifax or are they just hoping to avoid a lump of coal? Read about Celine v. The People of the Harbour.

Comments
Hans - November 23, 2007 11:14 am
Dalton McGuinty began his campaign to usurp Stephane Dion as Canadian Liberal leader yesterday in Charlottetown by announcing the re-instatement of Ontario funding for the Confederation Centre which Ole Blood N Guts Mike Harris had eliminated during his "Destroy Institutional Infrastructure" Revolution. Dalton used all kinds feel good patriotic language in coughing up $200,000 per year for the Theatre/Art Gallery/Memorial. The federal Tories, being all too aware of the anti-Dion forces designs and pretensions for Dalton, began their character assassinations accordingly. Judging from the other bullet points, the Tory strategy is clearly to try "define" their opponents even before they actually become their opponents. Hence, Dalton is a small Canadian and Denis Coderre is Uncanadian for asking questions. I guess they figure they already buried Dion himself, their current Liberal foe but they may be getting ahead of themselves.
Alan - November 23, 2007 11:25 am
"officials Threats"
I think the Tories have decided to run towards the label of arrogant dopes as fast as they can. This bunch would not last five minutes if they had not come up against the combination of the weakest Liberal leadership ever and a booming economy thanks to oil and Chretien's axing of Federal waste.
Sean Liddle - November 23, 2007 11:41 am
"which torpedoes"
Hans: how typically unCanadian of you to decry our crappy CanCon celeb that we are supposed to support like a good patriot even though the sound of her voice hurts ones ears and delicate sensibilities. (She AND Nickelback)
I used to like McKay too. Now he has devolved into the "if you don't agree with us and go against us in public, we will pretend we are American Republicans, start calling food by different names and question your patriotism and support of the troops". Freedom Toast, Freedom Fries, Freedom Poodles, Freedom Kisses, For Tonight Only, Three Freedom Dancers On Stage at the Plaza Hotel!!!
sean liddle - November 23, 2007 12:17 pm
I prefer a NOT spending tax.. so people who can afford to NOT spend $80000 a year get taxed thrice as much as me.
Hans - November 23, 2007 2:57 pm
Oh its true Sean. I feel huge amounts of unCanadianish guilt because I despise Nickelback as much as I hate Celine. I also don't think much of the Guess Who. Oh the shame!
David Janes - November 23, 2007 3:32 pm
Man, I'm trying to figure out what Sean said. Who are the people who don't spent money but could who are being taxed a lot right now? Did I understand that correctly? This would hit trust fund kids a lot worse than they are now because we'd treat all inputs (i.e. non-reinvested money) as income.
Sean Liddle - November 23, 2007 4:18 pm
I'l joking people. As in claiming that if someone can afford to sock away as much as I have to spend each year then they be taxed on it heavily to punish them for being better off. Joking. Sheesh. I at least expected Gord to pop in and agree with me then go off on a tangent about eating the rich or something like that ;)
Alan - November 27, 2007 5:15 pm
It appears PEI has not heard of PIPEDA: personal information collected in commercial transations are subject to Federal privacy protection.
Hans - November 28, 2007 10:01 am
While not surprising, it does give some clarity to the problem of the PEI governments unseemly interference in an individual who lives in PEI making a purchase outside PEI.