A fabulous day is here. The Friday that begins the great final melt, the weekend the rains come. Soon we will be smelling things, things that have been out there under the snow and ice for months. Soon car windows will be down, we will notice sounds from a distance as we sit in our houses, dogs a few streets over will interrupt our thoughts, the neighbours fights will introduce new words to the kids. Tra-la!
- Update: Did you know that Kingston has the lowest unemployment between Halifax and Winnipeg? 5.0% percent.
- Update: I had never heard the phrase "pimp my Zamboni" until I heard this story.
- I am a broken record, I know, but sometimes you still here the music between the skips and so it is with great pleasure that I give you the greatest conversation of the week making fun of Web 2.0. An argument between people who want pornier porn and those who can advocate this with a straight face - "beware the coming misappropriation of the phrase 'social software'." Fabulous in its meaninglessness.
- Indeed - what has Ghana done anyway?
- Here is new information I did not know before. With all the talk of hands off our resources, the right way is the only way, and Alberta is taking the lead...now they are begging to not have their special case Federal tax break taken away:
Alberta Finance Minister Lyle Oberg warned Thursday against any move by Ottawa to scrap a special tax break for the oil sands, saying it would be the final punch in a triple whammy blow to the energy sector. The Harper government, which needs Opposition party support to pass its March 19 budget, is reviewing an NDP call to scrap what's called the accelerated capital cost allowance program for oil sands...tax expert Jack Mintz of the University of Toronto's Rotman School of Management estimates that oil sands projects would pay $165-million more in federal and provincial corporate income tax a year if the income tax rules applied to them were the same as conventional oil and gas investments. But, he adds, if oil sands investments were treated the same as Alberta's non-energy projects, the additional tax would be $440-million a year.
Maybe we can have these bonuses put on the table when we have to deal with the insufferable self-promoters of the West that lies between BC and Sask next time. Nice to have been pulling their weight so they can tell us how self-sufficient they are. - Speaking of meaninglessness, apparently Red Sox veteran pitcher Curt Schilling is blogging.
- A couple of travelers sent me nine photos of their trip to Belgium. I like their travel planning.

Comments
cm - March 9, 2007 8:47 AM
Happy Friday, all! I've got nothing further to add to the conversation. Carry on.
gr - March 9, 2007 8:58 AM
spring outfit=lederhosen
Gordo - March 9, 2007 9:51 AM
Gary, let's start a collection to get a lederhosen for Alan. He can wear it while playing extreme croquet in City Park.
Alan - March 9, 2007 10:03 AM
I'd say I was verkempt at the prospect but that might be taken the wrong way.
Tyrolean hats might be sweet for the KSPC.
Alan
gorthos - March 9, 2007 10:32 AM
pornier porn.. That is by far the phrase of the upcoming season I think. Like Whiter Whites and Louder Noise.. it is a term that only those that promote it can truly define it.
I return to my wall-less-cave to ponder how one could upgrade the porn that is available to be more pornier without teh ability to add T'Pol or Orion Slave Girls..
w00t
Paul of Kingston - March 9, 2007 10:37 AM
Shame on the oil sands. When will Canada and the rest of the world wake up and see them for what they really are - a shocking publically subsidized boondoggle that threatens the viability of the entire planet. Yippee let's all get rich digging oil out of the ground! They produce 10 times more greenhouse gasses than conventional oil? Who cares let's get rich! They require 25% of Canada's natural gas production to steam the tar fro mthe sands? Who cares - let's get rich! The vast impoundments oftailings are so fine that there really isn't a realistic way to stabilize them and prevent them from one day flowing into the Athabasca RIver? Who cares let's get rich! Canadians subsidize the oil sands industry to the tune of half a billion dollars each year? Who cares let's get rich!
Don't have oils ands in your province? Who cares! Legalize kiddie porn, sell organs harvested from the poor on ebay, turn your lakes into hazardous waste disposal areas, open up a slave trade.
What's really the diff? It's all easy money at everyone and everthing else's expense.
End of rant **--**
Gordo - March 9, 2007 11:27 AM
Paul, don't forget the water usage: 3 barrels of water for every barrel of oil extracted.
gr - March 9, 2007 11:33 AM
I am glad you gents are on the big topics, therefore I can cover the silly ones. I give you, folks, dancing lederhosen
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYbPhwkCPH4
gorthos - March 9, 2007 11:35 AM
Paul is right. I was just too lazy to givemy standard anti-oil sands rant so thanks P for doing so.
now back to my under the desk Costanza nap
Paul of Kingston - March 9, 2007 4:30 PM
Yes - and the water wastage too. Good catch Gordo.