Asked about Mr. Burns's allegation that the Conservative government had "clumsily" politicized his resignation, Mr. Clement stuck to his script. "I don't want to get into 'he said or she said," I don't think that's what Canadians want to hear about..."Seeing as support for Harper is collapsing because of stuff like this I am sure it is not what Canadians want to hear. But given the government is no longer new and has to stand up and be responsible for its own actions, now unable to look around for a Liberal to blame every time, it's what we have to hear.
How many years did it take Harper to get from 29% to 36% in the polls? How many weeks did it take for him to lose it?

Comments
Ben (The Tiger) - December 20, 2007 2:44 PM
He goes up and down.
Tends to hit 40% support right after budgets and mini-budgets, which is why I thought he'd have a decent shot at a majority on the campaign trail.
Still, he's made himself look particularly bad in this case, so it might have a little more staying power.
We'll see come February, when Dion may or mayn't take a crack at taking it down.
Chris Taylor - December 20, 2007 4:42 PM
As long as it's within a hair or two of the margin of error, I'm not getting excited.
Alan - December 20, 2007 4:58 PM
Just for giggles, what would your response have been had the Liberals dropped 6%?
Ben (The Tiger) - December 20, 2007 5:59 PM
I believe this is what I said, the last time the Tories hit 40.
Chris Taylor - December 20, 2007 6:15 PM
<i>Just for giggles, what would your response have been had the Liberals dropped 6%?</i>
I have a very fatalistic Lovecraftian view of Liberal poll results. My first thought is that regardless of current polls, the Liberals are the Natural Governing Party and have the supernatural ability to win a majority at any time and place of their choosing. One day they will select Justin, Sacha or both as hereditary co-Emperors-for-Life and then the only escape will be to hope that they, like Cthulhu, devour you first.
My second thought is that I am going to wake up one morning and find that it's late 2003 and Mr. Dithers is still a highly regarded former Finance Minister who has finally gotten into the big chair.
Alan - December 20, 2007 6:31 PM
Aaarrrghhhghrh! Even I wouldn't want Martin back. That is too scary.
Alan - December 20, 2007 6:34 PM
And, yes, Ben - you are quite fair to yourself: statistics and polls are a mugs game. My interest here, as is usually with politics, is the day the veneer comes off and the accusations as to why the government fell begin. That days is just plain fun.
Ben (The Tiger) - December 20, 2007 8:21 PM
Oh, I figure that Harper's flaws are what they are -- he's the worst possible Conservative leader except, as the expression goes, for all the others we've seen on the Canadian political stage right now.
If he goes down, it'll be his fault, and in ways we have foreseen. But who knows how it'll be, and when.
Alan - December 20, 2007 8:35 PM
I wonder why we are in this bad patch? I think one reason is that both the Grits and Tories have reduced the Federal presence to the point that it is often better to be a provincial-level cabinet minister than a Federal back bencher. Not to mention downloading to the municipalities giving plenty of useful meaty work to the politicians at the level I get to work with. Plus, as the responsibilities at the Federal level have lessened the ideology has become more strident. Provincially, I think there is little ideologically to choose from amongst any of the Premiers. Canadians like the middle road and those that work it diligently and quietly.
Sean Liddle - December 20, 2007 8:46 PM
...And Chris invokes Cthulhu and thereby completely makes my week.. Personally I like to close my eyes and imagine the Harperites as the denizens of Innsmouth :)
WCG - December 21, 2007 12:52 AM
Progress! I shall continue the kitten sacrifices. Watch the papers after the next full moon for an election call.