Not to be an utter crank who can't spell today, but shouldn't major sports teams have their own separate jersey designs? This picture from the English Premiership is rather CFL circa 1994, a la Shreveport Pirates v. Las Vegas Posse, no?
Canada's Favorite Blog
Almost Famous
Articles
- Articles for the sister station, A Good Beer Blog.
- Pick any day's tunes as heard on CBC Ottawa's All in a Day hosted by my personal emailing buddy, Brent Bambury. You won't find a better music selection on radio anywhere - certainly not on the deeply dowdy CBC.
- Another plume catches my eye.
- Stuff less serious than Stuff.
- From Jan to March 2006, I tried a group humour blog with others on the subject of Canadian politics. It did not last but the posts were worth keeping. #16 was banned. There were no comments. It was at www.shadowcabinet.ca.
- Some writings and other junk of little real interest unless you like law or are a Crow.
A display of hideous graphics focused on the goal of figuring out where the smokestack I can see to the south is sitting.
Comments
Flea - September 16, 2006 12:58 PM
Some help with the spelling of things.
Nicholas - September 16, 2006 5:55 PM
The European football teams' finances appear to depend much more on mundane things like the sale of replica jerseys (and probably more lucratively, the company logo displayed centrally on each jersey). Unlike in the NFL or MLB, where a team will happily wear the same uniform for decades, most Premier League teams modify their uniforms every season. AND they all appear to have more than just "home" and "away" strip as well.
With that many redesigns, you're bound to have more iterations which look, um, what's the word I'm looking for? "CFL-ish" isn't quite it . . .
Alan - September 16, 2006 5:59 PM
I use "ceeffellian".
Mike - September 16, 2006 6:40 PM
They all look great though if you put "Vennegoor of Hesselink" on the back.
http://www.celtic.vitalfootball.co.uk/article.asp?a=31059
Rgds
Mike Floyd of Campbell