Suffocate? That is a bit odd, a bit much - especially for a 19-9 game. More like a lambasting or even a knee-capping if you ask me. Maybe a piano wiring.
Canada's Favorite Blog
Almost Famous
Articles
- Articles for the sister station, A Good Beer Blog.
- Pick any day's tunes as heard on CBC Ottawa's All in a Day hosted by my personal emailing buddy, Brent Bambury. You won't find a better music selection on radio anywhere - certainly not on the deeply dowdy CBC.
- Another plume catches my eye.
- Stuff less serious than Stuff.
- From Jan to March 2006, I tried a group humour blog with others on the subject of Canadian politics. It did not last but the posts were worth keeping. #16 was banned. There were no comments. It was at www.shadowcabinet.ca.
- Some writings and other junk of little real interest unless you like law or are a Crow.
A display of hideous graphics focused on the goal of figuring out where the smokestack I can see to the south is sitting.
No win no fee claim solicitors.
Compare cheap life insurance quotes.
Comments
Temujin - July 30, 2006 4:53 pm
I agree, allowing 9 points isn't much of a suffocation.
How about Riders <i>outlast, outwit, and outplay</i> the Stamps?
T-Bo - July 30, 2006 9:46 pm
As a long-time Green Rider fan (they had George Reed and Ron Lancaster....those guys were awesome!), but also a realist, I suggest...."Roughriders Somehow Beat Stampeders".
Mike - July 31, 2006 7:58 am
Maybe a little more of a western flavour?
"Roughriders corral Stampeders"?
"Roughriders outgun Stampeders"?
"Roughriders call in the Northwest Mounted Police and have arrested all the Stampeders"?
T-Bo - July 31, 2006 8:23 pm
"Roughies wrangle Stamps."
Alan - July 31, 2006 8:51 pm
I was thinking that it was a grotesque choice of word. Why not "Roughriders strangle Stampeders" or "Roughriders knife Stampeders"?
T-Bo - August 2, 2006 7:03 pm
Roughriders gently best Stampeders, then take them out and buy them Lagers.