I think I would have presumed this is the case just as I presume from the referral logs awash with hits from certain Asian cities that the Chinese government sweeps blogs for references to itself:
Bloggers beware.My only real fear is that there is a dossier somewhere being built entitled "Suspected Agents of the Flea" and that sooner or later there will have to be some explaining to do.As the world turns networked, the Pentagon is calculating the military opportunities that computer networks, wireless technologies and the modern media offer. From influencing public opinion through new media to designing "computer network attack" weapons, the US military is learning to fight an electronic war.

Comments
ry - January 30, 2006 10:10 am
Crimminey(SP?), that's a joke right? The NuCons have been in power, what, a week, and already you're scared? Come on, Al, we though you were made of sterner stuff(Mr. I-wear-shorts-in-ice-storms).
Infowar is an equal oppurtunity employer. If it isn't the West will always lose. At some point you have to trust that the people in charge in the military aren't the same oppurunists in charge of Parliament or Congress. Guys like JoA for instance, or Sanger. I've met a score of them that make me unafraid of it. And, are you aware that the PRC already has a netbrigade set up to do just this, where's the unrestrained horror at that? Infowar HAS to be an equal oppurtunity employer.
Alan - January 30, 2006 10:38 am
Your position has been noted by a braod cross-section of the information gathering community.
Johnny Nemo - January 30, 2006 10:53 am
I think it is very dangerous to believe that "At some point you have to trust that the people in charge in the military aren't the same oppurunists in charge of Parliament or Congress." We pretty much *can* assume that the people in charge of *anything* are opportunists in the same way; that's not cynicism, it's a defence mechanism. The managerial, CYA mentality inevitably infects any bureaucratic system, of which the Canadian Forces is one.
Alan - January 30, 2006 10:58 am
Just to be clear, I don't think our new rural overlords or their Defence Department staff are major players in the surveillance game or misinformation - despite my bulging file with them. I think the quotation above is clearly focused at larger forces in the world more closly related to ry and his peeps. I take further advice on this point from the weekly TV expose in the style of a rockumentary entitled "E-Ring".
Gordo - January 30, 2006 11:10 am
Embrace the information gathering and revel in it, Alan. One of these days, I'm going to have to get a copy of my RCMP file. I have two Royal Visit press passes to my name from a previous professional life, and I'm curious to see what else there might be. The only question is whether or not I'll be disappointed if there's nothing ... LOL
Alan - January 30, 2006 11:12 am
I would like to see the notes on me as a 14 year old getting schedules from Moscow. I even had my questions answered on the air by them! During the Brezhnev era no less.
Gordo - January 30, 2006 11:24 am
Wow. I was a bit of a pest for various departments testing the Access to Information regs, too ... The RCMP was among them .. LOL
I also find it's rather amusing to go through US customs with two Cuban immigration stamps in them .. LOL
Flea - January 30, 2006 11:32 am
Agents of the Flea need not worry. You forget who is writing the dossier.
Alan - January 30, 2006 11:45 am
Excellent. That tidbit will never be caught by the autobots for filing, either.
ry - January 31, 2006 6:51 am
Real problem with Johnny Nemo.
That kinda leaves you only with Anarchism, no? At some point, at some level, it always comes down to you being able to trust whether it be gov't, military, or law enforcement. This 'defense mechanism' is really for those you don't trust. Cynicism or skepticism is one thing, but being fundementalist about it is something else entirely.
As I've said on the 9/11 placement thread this comes from a deep seated, and in many instances an irrational, fear of a gov't conspiracy to get you. I've got an FBI file. It comes from being associated with some of the people I know. So what? It's a white blood cell response. You can't always rely on the 'skin' to get the job done and so you need an internal mechanism to keep things working.
The real problem is abuse, which is fine to fear, but abuse is NOT inevitable(and I'm relying on numbers/set theory here to prove my point---you don't know everything in the given set so you cannot make a definitive statement about it.).