Gen X at 40

Canada's Favorite Blog

Comments

Alan -

From Paul Krugman in today's NYT op-ed:<blockquote class="smalltext">
Such scenes, which enlarge the ranks of our enemies by making America look both weak and brutal, are inevitable in the guerrilla war President Bush got us into. Osama bin Laden must be smiling.</blockquote>I remember talking in Halifax to a former Druize militia man maybe 15 years ago about the perception of the US around the time of the killing of 200 soldiers by a truck bomb - here is Reagan's speech after the event. Although he was not one of the sides fighting the multinational force, he was amazed how that characterization I read again was the case - weak and brutal - both caused by the reliance on technology and collective force. He said he was very glad to be out of it all, as he made my lunch.

Alan -

The Guardian today has this:<blockquote class="smalltext">It was the deadliest single incident in the Iraqi capital for six months, but there was nothing unique about the explosion; it took place a few hundred metres from Haifa Street, a well-known centre of resistance to the American occupation and the scene of heavy fighting on Sunday. It was embarrassingly close to the green zone and the US embassy. But it reveals a grim truth about the nature of Iraq's evolving insurgency: Iraqis are killing Iraqis. In recent months, and especially since the handover of "power" to the unelected interim government, Iraq's resistance has concentrated its efforts on killing those who collaborate with the Americans - the police officers, would-be police officers, translators, governors and government officials. It is beginning to look like, and feel like, civil war.

...

In the run-up to the January elections, Iraq's pro-US interim prime minister, Ayad Allawi, faces some stark choices. He and the US military can try to reoccupy the towns they have abandoned, or accept that there is little prospect of the polls taking place in much of Iraq's Sunni Muslim heartland. Some Sunni groups have dismissed the elections as a "fake", and no one quite knows whether the insurgency will fizzle out after January or, as seems more likely, become more intense. The interim president, Ghazi al-Yawar, said yesterday that the elections should go ahead. "Unless the UN says it is impossible to hold it, we're going to hold it at that time," he said.
</blockquote>When would it stop being called an insurgency? Is it an insurgency where the US and the Iraqi government have left zones abandoned?

Post a Comment: I Don't Get It

Email addresses are not displayed with your comment and will not be shared.
Allowed tags are: <em>, <strong>, <code> and <a href="url">. All other tags will be displayed as plain text.