
I just finished listening to The Connection and its coverage of bloggy coverage of the Democratic Convention. I was a bit disconcerted to see that the live show and the live web cam [Ed.: as illustrated] were a bit at odds but that probably is an effect of simply too many media. Canadians will remember the host, Dick Gordon, as the great summer replacement for whatever CBC One radio show host was on vacation in the 1990s. He is truly the one that got away leaving us nothing but shows I no longer listen to before noon and little thereafter..until Brent of course.
I fear for the prospects of this moment when the "blogger as journalist" wing-nuttery is in ascendence. Will anyone review the success of blogs or are we still in that "my kids play t-ball" phase where any effort has to be applauded? I think sooner or later we have to have a process of evaluating the value of a blog or blogs by a measuring tool more useful than the number of people reading them if they are going to be taken for something beyond chat, something with authority. To be fair, the show discussed how many bad blogs there are and also how many offically vetted ones there are. My concern has also been how many "important" ones there are, which is as much as result of savvy marketing by the needy as the quality of content. This phenomena apparently is dieing down, however, as readers realize that politics differs from techie news and that, unlike an answer to a tech question, there are few authoritative "opinions" in a participatory democracy.
My hope is that the convention coverage will show the real gems are the primany blogs - messages from people doing things - and not the observers, the official 20 or more invitees. While there is no authoritative opinion, there is still the authority of access to simple fact, the giving of unique witness. Good for the general observer blogger, I say, as we need to each watch more and be aware but great for the do-er who explains.
Later: That all being said, the Rukster News Service (RNS) is looking very much like a junior high hi-jinks kind of endeavour. By the time he is done his unseen unnoticed investigative reporting on the protocols, he may be dropping water balloons on the Kerry team just to blog it. Also, notice the lack of security and picture Pete's theoretical evil cousin in his place.

Comments
Ben - July 26, 2004 1:55 pm
I've pretty much stopped reading political blogs and stuck to reading blogs for pretty much entertainment purposes only- movie blogs, sports blogs and blogs of people I know or who I find entertaining. I've been finding most political blogs too vitrolic and uninforming.
Alan - July 26, 2004 3:29 pm
Sadly, the bloggers blogging the convention appear to have reverted to the blindlingly important question of how more blogging could be introduced into the political process. The offical bloggers get to have breakfast together to blog about bloggers eating. Ruk is off to find his own sandwich after blogging the key colours of the seats issue. I am putting money on Ruk either blowing the whole blogging thing wide open or getting a night in the drunk tank.
Alan - July 27, 2004 8:33 am
Radio coverage seems a bit more spartan than the bloggers and no one is writing articles about radio and politics even though a bazillion more people follow it through that medium comapred to blogs.
SayNay? - July 27, 2004 9:08 am
Hasn't the interest always been about blogging with the "insiders" and not the "observers"? The difficulty is in finding the genuine. Part of the problem is that blogging at one time seemed rebellious, now it's just "mainstream" - pap. RIP
Alan - July 27, 2004 9:31 am
bing-o<p>I say we break out the ham radios 'cause I'm betting that will be the next big thing.
Alan - July 27, 2004 3:49 pm
Peter at the RSN is finding the point of the Convention all a bit of a mystery while Cory at Boing is really ticked that bloggy geeks are not being respected for the adults they appear to be. I find Peter's concerns about the point of it all a bit more convincing.