Gen X at 40

Canada's Favorite Blog

Comments

David Janes -

It's 99.9% bullshit. Does the government need 4.3% for Health Spending? Fine: increase some combination of Income Tax and/or Sales Tax to get that money and get it over with. Don't event regressive new taxes when we have a perfectly fine system in place to get the goddamn money now.

Alan -

Well, we could borrow and have my children pay for their childhood care or we could just not give health care to them (lived where that happens - not thanks) so I will happily live in the 0.1% world where people pay their way. If it is regressive shift the formula but a dedicated tax for a dedicated core purpose works.

David Janes -

I'm not saying borrowing. I'm saying we have perfectly fine mechanisms for taking money from citizens; we don't need a new one. It's inefficient (i.e. causes unnecessary loss of cash) from the government's POV and from business' POV.

And quite frankly, there are no dedicated taxes -- they are an illusion. The X dollars collected for any dedicated tax simply frees up $X in general revenue for other purposes.

It's this type of dishonest slight of hand -- taxing while pretending it's not a tax -- that really makes my teeth grit. The government needs money? Fine, go take it from me, but don't pretend you're not by calling them "fees", "levies", "insurance" or whatever.

Kim -

Well since I've lost $10.00 a pay; I've lost my doctor too and have been unable to find a new one for me, my hubby or my kids :( Although one doesn't necessarily have to do with the other, I am bitter at knowing that prior to paying, I at least had a doctor to go to.

Post a Comment: Health Tax = Health Spend

Email addresses are not displayed with your comment and will not be shared.
Allowed tags are: <em>, <strong>, <code> and <a href="url">. All other tags will be displayed as plain text.