Gen X at 40

Canada's Favorite Blog

Comments

Rob Paterson -

A big difference that I note betwen the England that I grew up in and here is that when we put on a concert in the UK - you were good or you did not participate. My choir was good enough to sing at the local cathedral. Picture Rob in a red cassock and a white ruffle collar and white surplice!!! Cute. My point is that we were expected to be good and we had tough material and were well taught. Is it a matter of expectations? I dread going to these types of things here where the material is easy, badly done with no effort put into it. My school only had 70 boys so the issue was not size of pool but how seriously we took music. The benefit is a sense of achievment. What is taught when all you have to do is to drone away?

Alan -

This course is actually very good, very structured with set goals but there is little pressure in the sense I know you are talking about. The course of called Music for Young Children which is franchised across Canada. $14 bucks a week = two pints with tip. I can live with that.<p>The person behind it all is my junior choir leader form Kingston United days in the early '70's, Frances Balodis now Frances Balodis Ltd. I am all for anyone, tone deaf or not, belting it out and banging the drum - just taking the course or being in any group activity in itself is a good thing. But being in the class does not give you talent and that's the diff. There were a few kids who really were musical, could string notes together whether it was a teen playing a complex piece or a five year old plunking out "Mary Had a Little Lamb."

Post a Comment: Christmas Recital

Email addresses are not displayed with your comment and will not be shared.
Allowed tags are: <em>, <strong>, <code> and <a href="url">. All other tags will be displayed as plain text.